Special Meeting/Workshop January 29, 2007
Midtown Center Meeting Room 5:00 PM
 
MINUTES

At 5:08 p.m. Chair Vern Newby called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Trustees Edie Brooks, Sid Fredrickson, and Diane Zipperer were present. Christie Wood was absent.

Superintendent Harry Amend provided an update about the recent situations at both high schools. The Crisis Assistance Team responded and members were available over the weekend at each school. Principals at both schools met with their staff members this morning and shared a statement for students to be read during first period. Team members were available for students as needed during the day as well.

2005 Supplemental Levy Budget Overview: Steve Briggs, CFO said he has been able to identify approximately $5 million in program funding that has been supported by the levy. It is difficult to identify all funds because they have been embedded in the budget for so many years.

Funds allocated by program areas were shown on a spreadsheet. Information included total budget, portions of that budget allocated to supplemental levy funds, and percent of budget. He highlighted each program item, line by line. He identified those funds easily identifiable; additional program support funds are those items not as easily identifiable. For example, instructional programs are impacted to some degree by levy funds. Therefore, based on this discussion, he arbitrarily cut $7.3 million from the budget and produced a sample list of what these cuts might look like. These programs would no longer be funded by the general fund. By doing this, Mr. Briggs was able to show expenditures of $5.4 million dollars; this shows just how important these levy funds are. Assistant Superintendent Hazel Bauman added that the reality is there are only a few categories that the district can cut; and what is shown on the sample list are those areas. The Board can choose to assign percentages of cuts. Coeur d’Alene School District patrons have given us the ability to enhance programs. These value added programs would be gone if the levy fails.

Mr. Amend reviewed the process used in planning for the levy: a questionnaire was posted on the web site for community members and staff; responses totaled more than 1,000. Admin. Council (50 members) dedicated their December meeting to sharing ideas and input for the levy. 104 people attended an input forum in January where they met in small groups to offer solutions to challenges and ways to overcome them. They were also asked about a recommended amount. Administrators met separately with CEA membership and PTA Alliance. Some areas where the responses are consistent: support for overall programs offered in the district, recommended amounts range from $7.3 to $10 million.

Assistant Superintendent Hazel Bauman identified areas of need in addition to the current $7.3 million.
• ALP – elementary is doing well but they still have some challenges. Facilitators are equally deployed regardless of school size. Three grade levels are served by the facilitator, and augmentation is needed. Add 2 FTE’s to the elementary program to enable better growth.
• Remediation programs – materials, professional development and teachers are needed.
• Curriculum materials – additional materials are needed.
• Professional development – we previously cut mentoring and the TOSA program and we can’t go another year without professional development. All staff are affected; training must be continuous.
• Academic shortfalls – we have seen a flattening of scores.
• Special programs – counseling/guidance, transition programs, and trail creek are all important programs to reinstate if possible.

• Class size – when teaching positions were cut, class sizes increased. We should target certain grade levels to get class size down by increasing FTE’s.
• Contract – teachers deserve a raise.
• Co-curricular programs – how can we expand intramurals, clubs and activities to include low income families. There is a strong correlation that kids in co curricular typically come from middle income families.
• Technology - all of the state assessments are done using computers and it’s critical to include technology in our areas of need. The last SPFL provided $700,000 per year.

The Board and administration may want to think about reallocating future resources to address the issues listed above.

Board Levy Input: Chair Newby said that based on the recent joint meeting with the City Council, we may want to consider televising our Board meetings. Public Information Officer Janet Feiler is on the CDA TV committee and she will ask for an estimate. Startup costs – (1 time only) are potentially $12,000 to $60,000. Chair Newby would like to move ahead as soon as possible. Using the list provided by Ms. Bauman, discussion followed to identify dollar amounts needed to fund these items:

• Technology funding = $750,000
• Advanced Learning = $150,000
• COLA (cost of living) 3% + 3% = $445,000
• Class Size Reduction (is it possible to redeploy some administrative positions in order to accomplish this) This would be helpful in light of new graduation requirements. At elementary for example, to increase from 29 to 37 sections of first grades would reduce class size to 19. Cost = $360,000
• Professional development = $250,000

The SPFL is a better vehicle for providing technology support however, we must consider including it in the supplemental so we don’t fall behind. How much will it take to keep us up to date. Chair Newby asked where we are now and where were we four years ago as far as technology. Technology Director Jean Bengfort will provide information at a future workshop. Everything within the levy has increased in costs by at least 3%.

A Board Work Session has been scheduled for Feb. 8th to continue the discussion for levy and technology needs. The meeting will begin at 5:00 p.m.

Recess at 7:05 p.m.
Reconvened at 7:20 p.m.

Executive Session: Motion by Mr. Fredrickson, second by Mrs. Brooks for Executive Session: Idaho Code 67-2345 (b) to consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent or public school student; Roll Call Vote: Newby, Brooks, Fredrickson, Zipperer each “yes”. Trustee Wood was absent.

Christie Wood arrived at 7:30 p.m.
Returned to open session at 9:50 p.m.
No action was taken.
Meeting adjourned at 9:51 p.m.
Minutes 01-29-07
Page Three

Summary Statement of Executive Session

At 7:20 p.m. in accordance with Idaho Code 67-2345, Subsection (b), the Board held an Executive Session to consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent or public school student.

Vernon L. Newby, Chair, Board of Trustees

Lynn M. Towne, Clerk, Board of Trustees

Home

© 2003 Coeur d'Alene School District
311 N. 10th St.
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814